Links in this section:

 

Introduction
Evolution of WDS technique
Basics of WDS
Diffraction
Crystals
Detectors & Geometry
Comparison of EDS and WDS
Qualitative Analysis
Quantitative Analysis
Mapping
Summary

 

Quantitative Analysis

 

Nickel-based superalloy

 

The nickel-based superalloy analyzed here contains Al, Ti, Cr, Co, Ta, W, Re and Mo in addition to Ni.

 

While the W, Ta, and Re contribute to the ED spectrum, identification by ED is complicated by the presence of the large Ni Kβ line at 8.264 keV, along with several other L-family lines associated with Ta, W, and Re in the spectrum. The WD spectrum (Fig. 8), shows the lines from W, Ta, and Re, all clearly separated.

 

 

Quantitative results taken on this specimen are listed in Table 3. The alloy has first been analyzed using only EDS. Note that the standard deviations for Ta, W and Re are relatively high because of poor statistics and severe peak overlaps.

 

  ED only ED and WD
  analysed wt% std. dev. wt% analysed wt% std dev wt% method
Al 4.87 0.09 4.83 0.09 ED
Ti 1.007 0.05 1.011 0.05 ED
Cr 6.4649 0.09 6.406 0.09 ED
Co 9.62 0.151 9.55 0.153 ED
Ni 59.377 0.35 58.86 0.35 ED
Mo 0.629 0.11 0.533 0.01 WD
Ta 7.03 0.48 7.136 0.078 WD
W 6.393 0.55 6.585 0.077 WD
Re 3.264 0.443 3.099 0.05 WD

Table 3: Quantitative analysis of nickel-based superalloy comparing ED only with ED and WD analyses.

 

The second set of results is a combination of ED and WD data. Using INCAEnergy+, WD data is acquired simultaneously with the ED spectrum. Hence the total analysis time may not need to be increased. For trace elements and peaks that are severely overlapped in the ED spectrum, a large improvement in statistical precision can be obtained by using WD.

 

In general, statistical errors in the WD results can be much less than for ED quantitative analysis. This is because higher currents can be used, the peaks are not overlapped and have a better peak to background ratio.

 

Combined ED/WD analysis is a very practical way of achieving reliable quantitative analysis. ED can be used for accurate quantification of the elements present in relatively large amounts, and WD can be used for accurate quantification of elements present in amounts below 1 wt%. By using both techniques, the analyst exploits the speed of EDS analysis and the sensitivity of the WDS technique.

 

BPSG film

 

Borophosphosilicate (BPSG) films are used as a passivation layer for silicon devices in the semiconductor industry and the concentrations of boron and phosphorus affect the properties of these films.

 

Quantitative analysis of boron is virtually impossible using ED analysis because of the relatively poor peak to background ratio of the boron peak. However, using modern LSM crystals (in this case the LSM-200) it is possible to achieve excellent count rates with relatively low electron beam currents. Quantitative results are shown in table 4.

 

  wt%

sigma

wt%

at %
B 2.35 0.04 4.22
P 3.77 0.06 2.36
Si 37.6 0.38 25.98
O 54.6 0.36 66.23
N 0.87 0/19 1.21

 

Table4: Quantitative analysis of a BPSG film using WDS

 

Counting precision, even for a very light element such as boron, is excellent and the WD technique is a viable method for analysis of BPSG films.

Back | Next